Lesson Planning Fundamentals
Direct Instruction in Lesson Plans: Model, Practice, Check

Clarify what “direct instruction” means in the plan
Teachers often use direct instruction to mean explicit, teacher-led modeling and guided practice. Direct Instruction can also refer to a specific family of sequenced programs with program-specific materials and implementation requirements. This guide addresses the broad lesson-planning sequence. It is not a fidelity guide or an effectiveness claim for a branded program.
The Vanderbilt IRIS Center’s explicit-instruction module describes instructional elements including clear explanations, modeling, supported practice, frequent responses, feedback, and cumulative review. Select and adapt those elements for the objective, prerequisite knowledge, student evidence, and required access supports.
Build the sequence from objective to evidence
On a small screen, scroll this table horizontally to see all columns.
| Phase | Plan | Evidence | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Objective and prerequisite | Name the exact process or concept and the knowledge it requires. | One brief prerequisite item. | Reteach, supply a reference, or proceed. |
| Model | Demonstrate one representative example and explain the relevant decisions. | Students identify the step and its purpose. | Clarify the explanation or begin guided work. |
| Guided practice | Use examples that vary only in features students are ready to consider. | Responses from every student, not only volunteers. | Repeat, change the prompt, or reduce support. |
| Feedback | Name the correct step, the observed error, and the next attempt. | A corrected response or explanation. | Provide another item or move forward. |
| Independent practice | Use a task aligned with the modeled process. | Independent work under stated conditions. | Extend, review, or reteach a defined part. |
Worked example: comparing fractions
Objective: Compare two fractions with unlike denominators and justify the comparison with a common-denominator representation.
- Prerequisite check: Ask every student to generate one equivalent fraction for 1/3.
- Model: Compare 2/3 and 3/5. Explain why a common denominator allows a like-unit comparison, and show the multiplication used for each equivalent fraction.
- Guided item: Students compare 3/4 and 5/8 on mini whiteboards, showing both equivalent fractions.
- Understanding check: Ask students to explain which step creates like units. Review all responses before release.
- Independent item: Use a new pair with the same process but different numbers.
A correct guided response supports the next decision for this objective. It does not establish permanent mastery, general engagement, or future achievement.
Plan access without lowering the objective
- Provide the worked example in a readable format students can revisit.
- Read symbols and notation aloud when that supports access.
- Use manipulatives or a diagram when they represent the same mathematical relationship.
- Preteach necessary vocabulary and provide required accommodations or assistive technology.
- Allow additional guided attempts when the evidence shows the prompt or model is not yet sufficient.
Do not group students by a fixed ability label or assume one pace fits everyone. Use current responses to change time, examples, prompts, grouping, or support.
When another approach may be needed
Explicit modeling is useful when students need a visible process, a new convention, or guided rehearsal. It should not replace every discussion, investigation, reading, project, or opportunity to make decisions. After students can perform the defined process, choose tasks that require appropriate application, comparison, explanation, or transfer, and assess those demands directly.
Planning checklist
- Is the objective observable and narrow enough to model?
- Have prerequisite knowledge and common errors been identified?
- Does the model explain decisions rather than merely display an answer?
- Will every student provide an accessible response during guided practice?
- Is feedback tied to a visible step or misconception?
- Is the release condition written before instruction?
- Does independent practice match what was modeled without copying it?