Thermal Energy Evidence Kits · v1.0.0
Kit 2 student packet
Return to Was It a Fair Comparison?
P · Read before evaluating a comparison
Target: Decide whether a comparison isolates sleeve performance. Prerequisites: read units/time, distinguish starts and changes, subtract whole numbers. If needed use Kit 1 or the support below: 10→14°C is 4°C warming; 30→26°C is 4°C cooling.
First name the question. To compare complete sleeve designs, keep other relevant conditions matched. To investigate a single sleeve feature, vary that feature while keeping the rest of the sleeve design matched too. A confound is another relevant difference that prevents assigning the result to the intended factor alone.
Data P · Imagined setup cards for a paper comparison of complete sleeve designs. No results supplied.
Constructed teaching data: these values were invented for this activity, not collected in an experiment.
| Condition | Sleeve A | Sleeve B |
|---|---|---|
| Water mass | 100 g | 100 g |
| Start | 10°C | 10°C |
| Cup and lid | Cup C + lid L | Cup C + lid L |
| Time / room | 20 min / 22°C | 20 min / 22°C |
| Reading method | Same method | Same method |
K2-P1. What is being compared? What would be measured? Name two conditions kept the same.
K2-P2. Would changing both the sleeve and water mass still isolate sleeve performance? Explain.
M · Model · Two things changed
Data M · Room 22°C, same 15-minute exposure, matching cups/lids and thermometer procedure. Two complete sleeve designs; water masses and starts differ.
Constructed teaching data: these values were invented for this activity, not collected in an experiment.
| Setup | Water mass (g) | Start (°C) | After 15 min (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sleeve A | 100 | 8 | 14 |
| Sleeve B | 200 | 10 | 13 |
K2-M1. Find both temperature changes. Can the difference be assigned to the sleeve alone? Explain.
K2-M2. Name the confounds. Propose actual matching conditions for a better sleeve comparison.
K2-M3. What descriptive conclusion is still possible? Does comparing changes repair the confounds?
G · Guided practice · Repair setup cards
Data G · Paper plans, not collected readings. The question asks which complete sleeve better limits warming.
Constructed teaching data: these values were invented for this activity, not collected in an experiment.
| Condition | Sleeve C | Sleeve D |
|---|---|---|
| Water mass / start | 100 g / 10°C | 100 g / 10°C |
| Cup | Cup C | Cup D |
| Lid | Lid L | No lid |
| Time / room | 20 min / 22°C | 20 min / 22°C |
| Reading method | Same method | Same method |
K2-G1. Identify what differs besides sleeve design. Explain why that matters.
K2-G2. Rewrite D’s setup to match C’s relevant conditions while still comparing sleeves C and D.
K2-G3. Give a consistent measurement and recording plan, including repeated trials. If the question were about one sleeve material, what else would need matching?
I · Independent task · Fresh critique
Data I · Both setups are in a 24°C room. Cups, lids, exposure position and reading method match. The sleeve design, mass and duration differ.
Constructed teaching data: these values were invented for this activity, not collected in an experiment.
| Setup | Mass (g) | Start (°C) | Time (min) | Final (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleeve E | 80 | 12 | 10 | 18 |
| Sleeve F | 120 | 12 | 20 | 16 |
K2-I1. Calculate each change. A fictional answer says “F works better because its water warmed less.” What is supported and what is too strong?
K2-I2. Identify the confounds and specify a repaired comparison with actual masses, starts and duration.
K2-I3. Describe how to repeat and record that comparison. State one limit even after repair.
A · Reteach · Subtraction does not fix a confound
Data A · Same 20 minutes in a 22°C room; cups, lids and method match. Sleeve and mass differ.
Constructed teaching data: these values were invented for this activity, not collected in an experiment.
| Setup | Mass (g) | Start (°C) | Final (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sleeve H | 60 | 10 | 17 |
| Sleeve J | 120 | 10 | 15 |
K2-A1. Find both changes. Can the lower increase isolate a sleeve effect? Repair the comparison.
Fresh check
Data Ac · New equal samples in a 23°C room, same cups/lids, method and 15-minute exposure. This is one matched trial.
Constructed teaching data: these values were invented for this activity, not collected in an experiment.
| Setup | Mass (g) | Start (°C) | Final (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sleeve U | 100 | 12 | 17 |
| Sleeve V | 100 | 12 | 16 |
K2-A2. What bounded sleeve comparison is supported? What is not established?
B · Reteach · Specify a usable plan
Data B · Three separate trials of fresh 100 g samples starting at 10°C in a 22°C room. Cups/lids, position, 20-minute interval and reading procedure match within and across trials.
Constructed teaching data: these values were invented for this activity, not collected in an experiment.
| Trial | Sleeve J final (°C) | Sleeve K final (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 16 |
| 2 | 16 | 17 |
| 3 | 15 | 16 |
K2-B1. Which sleeve shows less warming across these trials? Does this prove a particular material property?
K2-B2. Write a paper retest plan: compared factor, matched conditions, measurement method, number of fresh trials, and fields to record. Do not invent new readings.
Fresh check
Data Bc · Fresh equal 100 g water, 23°C room, matching cups/lids and reading method. Times differ.
Constructed teaching data: these values were invented for this activity, not collected in an experiment.
| Setup | Start (°C) | Time (min) | Final (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sleeve R | 11 | 20 | 16 |
| Sleeve S | 11 | 10 | 15 |
K2-B3. What needs repairing before attributing the result to the sleeve alone?
T · Later check · Cooling and a repaired test
Data T · Paper cooling task. Both in a 22°C room for 15 minutes; cups, lids and method match. Masses differ.
Constructed teaching data: these values were invented for this activity, not collected in an experiment.
| Setup | Mass (g) | Start (°C) | Final (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sleeve P | 100 | 36 | 29 |
| Sleeve Q | 150 | 36 | 32 |
K2-T1. Find both falls. Explain why “Q better limits cooling because its final value is higher” does not isolate a sleeve effect.
Data Tr · Repaired paper record: fresh 100 g samples all begin at 36°C in a 22°C room. Cups/lids, position, method and 15-minute interval match within and across trials.
Constructed teaching data: these values were invented for this activity, not collected in an experiment.
| Trial | Sleeve P final (°C) | Sleeve Q final (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 32 |
| 2 | 31 | 32 |
| 3 | 30 | 33 |
K2-T2. What comparison is now supported across trials? Include one meaningful limit.
K2-T3. Does this paper record show that you constructed and tested a device? Explain.