Extend: change context and compare responses: roles
All situations, people, observations and counts in this selection are invented for practice, not research or actual classroom results.
Use only the supplied information. Your position is not scored. Write, type, point and explain, or dictate as agreed with your teacher. Use extra labeled paper if needed.
This is exposed practice. Work with the support agreed with your teacher; later checks use different situations.
Puzzle-bag cards
A. A contents card can help borrowers notice a missing piece before they leave the puzzle area. B. The puzzle club should attach contents cards to its puzzle bags. C. The puzzle club has three puzzle meetings planned for next month. D. In an invented bag check, 8 of 10 borrowers used a contents card to notice a piece was missing before leaving.
Classify every labeled statement by its job here: claim, reason, specific relevant evidence, or unrelated detail. Explain how the evidence supports the reason and how the reason supports the claim. Give one limit on what the evidence shows. A detail about the same topic is not automatically relevant; limited evidence is not automatically unrelated.
After the core puzzle task, consider a different invented argument: “The puzzle club should publish a calendar so members can plan to attend. The puzzle club has three puzzle meetings planned for next month.” What job does the meeting statement do in this new argument? Explain why its job differs from C in the original.
A: ____ B: ____ C: ____ D: ____
Explain the argument links
Use Puzzle-bag cards from the preceding page. Use statement letters or accurate paraphrases.
Evidence to reason, then reason to claim
Explain both links, including why the unrelated detail has no stated link.
A relevant limit
Name what the supplied evidence does not show; say why that limit does not by itself make the evidence irrelevant.
Represent and answer the other view
All situations, people, observations and counts in this selection are invented for practice, not research or actual classroom results.
Gallery questions
In an invented class gallery, Dev proposes that visitors post questions on a large sheet beside each project so groups can respond later. Inez says: “A sheet could fill before quieter visitors add a question, and groups may not have time to answer every question. Each visitor could hand in one small question card instead.” No response time or number of visitors is supplied.
Write a fair reply. Accurately state at least one main concern and the speaker’s stated alternative; other concerns may be omitted. Explain why your selected concern matters and connect your reply to it. Give a related reason, practical change, agreement or qualification, and one remaining limit. Make your reasoning clear. You may support either option or propose a qualified response.
Plan your reply below. Continue on the next page.
One main concern and the stated alternative
Why the concern matters
Your reasoned reply and remaining limit
Use Gallery questions from the preceding page. Your reply can agree, disagree or qualify; your position is not scored.
Connected reply
Explain how your response addresses the selected concern. Name a remaining limit. You may combine the concern, alternative and importance with this reply.
Check clarity
Can a reader identify your selected concern, the stated alternative, the link to your response, and the remaining limit? Revise if needed.
Extension: a changed argument
After the core puzzle task, consider a different invented argument: “The puzzle club should publish a calendar so members can plan to attend. The puzzle club has three puzzle meetings planned for next month.” What job does the meeting statement do in this new argument? Explain why its job differs from C in the original.
Information to strengthen the original puzzle argument
Pose a question about the original claim and name how an answer would help. Do not make up a result.
Extension: another defensible reply
Write two defensible gallery replies: one favoring the cards and one retaining the sheets with a practical change. Each must fairly represent one main concern and the alternative, explain importance and response link, and name a remaining limit. Then name information needed to compare the options. Do not present a proposed plan as proven.
Use your earlier gallery reply as one of the two if it meets these conditions. Write the other here and identify the information still needed.